The Borrow Checker evaluates the lifetimes of values in order to make sure the Second Brain/PARA/Projects/Software Engineer in 2 years/Learning Rust/Memory Management/Borrowing rules are not being broken.

the goal is to check if:

Last Example:

fn main() {
	let s1 = String:from("hello world");
	let s2 = String:from("hello world again");

	let result: &str = longest(s1.as_str(), s2.as_str());

	println!("The longest string is {}", result);
}

// ERROR: missing lifetime specifier
fn longest(a: &str, b: &str) -> &str {
	if a.len() > b.len() {
		a
	} else {
		b
	}
}

Concrete vs Generic Lifetimes

concrete == the span of code where the ownership is valid and that the compiler infers.

but generic lifetimes are a type of generic that inform the compiler how references to data should be related to each other and ensuring that data lives long enough to be accessed.

take these for example

the concrete lifetime annotation is 'static

Concrete Lifetimes

fn get_static_str() -> &'static str {
	"I live forever!" 
	// This string lives for the entire duration of the program
}

fm main() {
	let s: &'static str = get_static_str();
	println!("{}", s);
}

Generic lifetime

fn get_str_with_lifetime<'a>(input: &'a str) -> &'a str {
	input 
	// the returned reference has the same lifetime as the input
}

fn main() {
	let input = String::from("hello");
	let result = get_str_with_lifetime(&input);
	println!("{}", result);
	// safe because input and result have the same lifetime.

	// without lifetimes, the function would not be able to return the borrowed input
}

Here, 'a is a generic lifetime. It doesn't specify how long the reference will live; it only guarantees that result will not outlive input.

In short:

• Concrete lifetimes are explicit (like 'static).
• Generic lifetimes allow for flexibility in how long references can live while ensuring safety.

These annotations help the compiler understand that we need to put the variables with extended lifetimes on the Heap, because normally they would